HomePeoplePlaylistCollection

Technology

Technology across one public Theatron post.

Jiang Xue Qin

Geo-Strategy END: Psychohistory (The Science of Imagining the Future)

Published Apr 10, 2026

Psychohistory, a concept popularized by Isaac Asimov’s *Foundation* series, proposes the mathematical prediction of human behavior on a galactic scale, a vision now being pursued in reality by historians like Peter Turchin through his field of Clio Dynamics. Turchin's work models historical patterns, revealing that societal collapses are often precipitated by an "overproduction of elites." When too many aspiring powerful individuals compete for a finite number of positions, such as Imperial China’s *Ke Ju* examination system producing more qualified candidates than official posts, internal struggles erupt, ultimately leading to social breakdown, as seen in the Taiping Rebellion led by a failed candidate, Hong Xiuquan. The ambition is to advance this with artificial intelligence, specifically supervised machine learning. This technology, which refines algorithms through iterative comparisons of input and desired output (e.g., facial recognition matching models to a billion-person database), could theoretically predict future events. However, AI’s capabilities are fundamentally limited; it requires clear, mathematically definable metrics, clean, labeled datasets, and a pre-existing algorithm structure to optimize. It cannot independently create an algorithm or account for subjective concepts like "the best ice cream." Critically, AI struggles with "edge cases," such as a human intentionally crashing a self-driving car out of malice, an act the AI cannot anticipate or prevent. Despite this limitation, the framework proposes applying supervised machine learning to geopolitical predictions, for instance, a US war with Iran, by modeling push factors like the Israel lobby and petrodollar protection against counterforces, then refining these models against historical conflicts such as Athens’ 415 BCE invasion of Sicily or Operation Barbarossa in 1941. Further refinement of psychohistory would integrate game theory analyses and understanding fundamental human desires. Recent European elections, demonstrating a clear shift to the right with parties like Marine Le Pen’s in France and AfD in Germany gaining significant votes, illustrate a rebellion against immigration, federalism, and pan-Europeanism. This societal backlash reflects a fundamental human need for local identity and community over abstract liberal ideals, a core element—the "human heart’s" desire to love, create, and grow—that must be mathematically modeled. Societal "synchronicity"—the willingness of people to follow rules and display cohesion—is another crucial factor, with high-synchronicity nations like Japan and Germany exhibiting greater resilience than those with low synchronicity. A society that represses the human heart will eventually collapse, as the unfulfilled need for creation can manifest as destruction. Yet, the model faces a profound challenge: accounting for "Great Men" like Julius Caesar or Vladimir Putin, who appear to step outside historical forces, potentially possessing "telepathic abilities" to control and direct events. Asimov’s solution was a "Second Foundation" of telepathic specialists to manage these edge cases. The ultimate vision for a psychohistory AI is a transparent, democratic platform allowing humanity to collectively agree on actions for a better future, particularly in a post-collapse world. Such a monumental project, requiring 50-100 years and multidisciplinary collaboration to rewrite history and predict future scenarios, faces immense opposition from established institutions and elites. However, in times of societal collapse, the necessary space and flexibility might emerge to pursue this ambitious endeavor, uniting humanity in a shared goal to recreate civilization more progressively and democratically.

Jiang Xue Qin